Bishop II (Alien 3) is Human

tashux22, Undefined, 15 years ago

What's important to remember is that Bishop II in the film stated he was real and clearly bled "real" blood when hit over the head by Aaron. Although the recent Alien VS. Predator film tries to change the canon of the film series, at the time of the release of Alien 3 the character of Bishop II was the human designer of the original bishop android.

More proof for this comes from the Extended Cut of Alien 3, in which additional scenes show Bishop writhing in pain, more red blood gushing out of his wound (androids have white blood), and him screaming to Ripley "I'm not a droid!"


Dumbass Paul Anderson is only saying Bishop II is an Advanced Android just to fix a plothole, in the Alien movies there was never an Android with red blood. Paul Anderson only made a poor excuse to say he is an Android with red blood!.


Androids in the Alien movies have a white liquid, analogous for blood They also seem to have "guts" as seen in Aliens. In the Alien movies there was never an Android with red blood!



1.The Makers of Alien 3 said he was Human
2.The Script for Alien 3 confirmed he was a Human
3.He was never an Advanced Android that was Paul Andersons poor excuse
4.Bishop II will be and always will be a Human



predator428, Undefined, 15 years ago

I agree with you. Bishop II was a real man when Alien 3 was made but the AvP films do have to be considered cannon. While the creaters of Alien 3 always intended for him to be human, AvP gave well enough reasons to "alter" cannon without completely breaking it.

Stalker, Undefined, 15 years ago

Charles Weyland was a descendant of Bishop II, although the fact they looked exactly alike is a bit of a stretch.

Weyland developed the original robotics technology, which his future relative eventually harnessed to create the line of androids.